Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 4.74 x 2.50 x 0.43 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.59 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 489.00 | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 250 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is way better than the ZTE Blade III, having an 82.9 score against 47.2. Google Pixel 4 XL is a thinner but extremely heavier device than ZTE Blade III. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a very superior performance than ZTE Blade III, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and more cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 4 XL features a much better screen than ZTE Blade III, because it has a lot higher 1440 x 3040px resolution, a way larger screen and a lot higher screen density. The Google Pixel 4 XL has a much better camera than ZTE Blade III, because it has a lot better video quality and a camera with a lot better resolution.
Google Pixel 4 XL features much more memory for games and applications than ZTE Blade III, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 4 XL features a superior battery lifetime than ZTE Blade III, because it has a 3700mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 4 XL is also a bit cheaper, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.