Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.2 | 56 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Nokia |
| Android 4.2 | Windows Phone 7.8, 7.5 Refresh, 7.5 Mango |
| 2013-10-31 | 2012-01-09 |
| 4.94 x 2.52 x 0.35 inches | 5.03 x 2.70 x 0.45 inches |
| -- | 5.64 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 APQ8055 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 1000 MB (266 MHz) RAM | 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-400 (Dual-Core 500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 7.92 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1830mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 350 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Lumia 900 has an overall score of 56, which is a little bit better than ZTE Blade Q Mini's 51.2 global score. The Lumia 900 works with Windows Phone 7.8, 7.5 Refresh, 7.5 Mango OS, and ZTE Blade Q Mini counts with Android 4.2 OS. The ZTE Blade Q Mini features a little sharper screen than Nokia Lumia 900, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal 800 x 480 resolution, the ZTE Blade Q Mini also counts with a little greater pixels number per inch of display.
The ZTE Blade Q Mini features a bit superior processing unit than Lumia 900, because it has 1 more cores , a better 1000 MHz GPU and 488 MB more RAM. The Lumia 900 features a better memory for games and applications than ZTE Blade Q Mini, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 12 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Nokia Lumia 900 takes greater videos and photos than ZTE Blade Q Mini, because it has a way more mega pixels camera in the back. The Lumia 900 features improved battery performance than ZTE Blade Q Mini, because it has a 1830mAh battery size instead of 1500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Lumia 900 is also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.