Compare phones
Samsung Epic 4G Touch
SPH-D710| Global Score | |
| 57.4 | 60.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 2.3.6, 2.3.4 |
| 2017-07-14 | 2011-08-30 |
| 6.14 x 3.06 x 0.38 inches | 5.11 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.12 ounces | 4.60 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 99.00 | $ 85.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 480 x 800 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 207 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 7.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 8917 chipset | Samsung Exynos chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Exynos (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.28 | 7.83 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 5.72 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | -- |
| 6 | 3.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 252 hours standby time 8.7 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Epic 4G Touch is slightly better than the ZTE Blade Spark, having a global score of 60.8 against 57.4. These phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Epic 4G Touch has 4.1.2 version and ZTE Blade Spark has Android 7.1 Nougat. Samsung Epic 4G Touch is a much lighter phone than the ZTE Blade Spark, but both of them are 0.38inches thick.
ZTE Blade Spark counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Epic 4G Touch, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The Samsung Epic 4G Touch counts with a little bit better looking display than ZTE Blade Spark, although it has a bit smaller screen, a way worse resolution of 800 x 480 and a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display.
The ZTE Blade Spark features a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Epic 4G Touch, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the ZTE Blade Spark also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. ZTE Blade Spark counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Epic 4G Touch, because it has 3140mAh of battery capacity against 1800mAh.
The Samsung Epic 4G Touch counts with a bit better camera than ZTE Blade Spark, although it has a lot worse 8 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a worse video quality.
The Samsung Epic 4G Touch is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper, which makes this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.