Compare phones
Samsung Evergreen
SGH-A667| Global Score | |
| 45.5 | 39.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| -- | 2010-11-01 |
| 4.25 x 2.18 x 0.72 inches | 4.56 x 2.20 x 0.59 inches |
| 4.58 ounces | 4.50 ounces |
| 262 144 | -- |
| $ 60.00 | $ 60.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | -- |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| LCD | TFT |
| 143 pixels per inch | 200 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 6.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 512 MB RAM | -- |
| Adreno 304 GPU | GPU |
| 7.92 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 262,14 MB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 1.8 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 4.73 | 4.84 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| LTE (4G) | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 4.8 | 0.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 1000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 2.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The ZTE Cymbal LTE is much better than the Samsung Evergreen, having a overall score of 45.5 against 39.1. The ZTE Cymbal LTE design is a little heavier and somewhat thicker than Samsung Evergreen. The Samsung Evergreen features a little bit better looking display than ZTE Cymbal LTE, and although they both have an equal 320 x 240 resolution, the Samsung Evergreen also has a better screen pixel density.
The ZTE Cymbal LTE has a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Evergreen, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 32 GB and 4 GB internal memory. ZTE Cymbal LTE has a much powerful CPU than Samsung Evergreen, because it has a larger number of faster cores. The Samsung Evergreen counts with a slightly better camera than ZTE Cymbal LTE. Both of them have a back-facing camera with a 2 MP resolution.
ZTE Cymbal LTE counts with a superior battery duration than Samsung Evergreen, because it has 1500mAh of battery capacity instead of 1000mAh.
ZTE Cymbal LTE costs the same than the Samsung Evergreen, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.