Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45 | 47.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | LG |
| -- | Android 2.3 |
| -- | 2012-02-21 |
| 4.10 x 2.20 x 0.70 inches | 4.04 x 2.43 x 0.47 inches |
| 3.80 ounces | 4.20 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 110.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 3.2 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| LCD | TFT |
| 143 pixels per inch | 125 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 5.9 | 6.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 384 MB RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | GPU |
| 7.92 | 7.11 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 1 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 2.72 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (20 fps) (HD) video resolution | 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution |
| 5.39 | 5.17 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 3 | 3.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 1540mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 600 hours standby time 12.5 hours talk time |
| 3.28 | 3.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Optimus L3 Dual is slightly better than the ZTE Cymbal Z-320, with a 47.3 score against 45. The LG Optimus L3 Dual is a just a little bit heavier but incredibly thinner phone than ZTE Cymbal Z-320. The ZTE Cymbal Z-320 features a superior processing unit than LG Optimus L3 Dual, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster).
The LG Optimus L3 Dual has a little more vivid screen than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, because although it has a just a little worse pixels amount per inch in the screen, and they both have exactly the same 320 x 240 resolution, the LG Optimus L3 Dual also counts with a quite larger display. ZTE Cymbal Z-320 features a little bit better camera than LG Optimus L3 Dual, because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot higher 1280x720 video definition.
ZTE Cymbal Z-320 has a superior memory to install games and applications than LG Optimus L3 Dual, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 32 GB, the ZTE Cymbal Z-320 also has 4 GB internal memory capacity. The LG Optimus L3 Dual has a bit better battery lifetime than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, because it has a 1540mAh battery size.
LG Optimus L3 Dual is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the ZTE Cymbal Z-320.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.