Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45 | 73.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-07-13 |
| 4.10 x 2.20 x 0.70 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 3.80 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black | Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 107.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| LCD | TFT |
| 143 pixels per inch | 267 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.9 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 8909 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (20 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.39 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is a lot better than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, with a global score of 73.1 against 45. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Star body is noticeably heavier but incredibly thinner than the ZTE Cymbal Z-320. Galaxy J7 Star has a better hardware performance than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, because it has a larger number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy J7 Star counts with a way better display than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, because it has a much higher screen pixel density, a way higher 720 x 1280 resolution and a lot bigger display. Galaxy J7 Star shoots much clearer videos and photos than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, because it has a way better 13 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot better 1920x1080 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, because it has more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 400 GB. Galaxy J7 Star has a much longer battery lifetime than ZTE Cymbal Z-320, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy J7 Star is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.