Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 65.1 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.01 x 2.99 x 0.34 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2500 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.5 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 40 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 5.12 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S III Cricket is slightly better than the ZTE nubia Z7 Max, having a 71.5 score against 65.1. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S III Cricket has older 4.0 version and ZTE nubia Z7 Max has Android 4.4.2 version. Galaxy S III Cricket's design has the same thickness than the ZTE nubia Z7 Max, but it's lighter.
The ZTE nubia Z7 Max has a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM, the ZTE nubia Z7 Max also has a larger number of faster cores and a faster graphics co-processor running at 450 megahertz. ZTE nubia Z7 Max has a bit better display than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a bit bigger screen, a much better resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a higher pixel quantity in each inch of screen.
ZTE nubia Z7 Max has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a back camera with a way better resolution, a lot higher (4K) video quality and a much larger aperture. The Galaxy S III Cricket has as much memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as the ZTE nubia Z7 Max one, both of them have the same 32 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 64 GB.
ZTE nubia Z7 Max has a really longer battery performance than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has 3100mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.