Compare phones
ZTE Quartz
Z797C| Global Score | |
| 51.3 | 62.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Nokia |
| Android 4.3 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-10-19 |
| 6.13 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 5.93 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 90.00 | $ 89.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 200 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8610 chipset | MediaTek Helio A22 MT6761 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8300 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia 2 V Tella is way better than ZTE Quartz, getting a global score of 62.1 against 51.3. The Nokia 2 V Tella design is a little bit thicker but just a bit lighter than ZTE Quartz. Both devices in this review use Android operating system, but the Nokia 2 V Tella has the newer 10 version and ZTE Quartz has Android 4.3 version.
The ZTE Quartz has just a bit better screen than Nokia 2 V Tella, although it has a lot worse screen density and a lot lower 960 x 540 resolution, they both have a screen with the same size. The Nokia 2 V Tella counts with much more storage for applications and games than ZTE Quartz, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 128 GB and 16 GB internal memory capacity.
Nokia 2 V Tella has a bit better processing unit than ZTE Quartz, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster). Nokia 2 V Tella has a better camera than ZTE Quartz, and although they both have a camera in the back with an 8 mega-pixels resolution, the Nokia 2 V Tella also has a lot higher video definition.
ZTE Quartz features a bit superior battery life than Nokia 2 V Tella, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Nokia 2 V Tella is also cheap compared to the ZTE Quartz.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.