Compare phones
ZTE Quartz
Z797C| Global Score | |
| 51.3 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Nokia |
| Android 4.3 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-06-10 |
| 6.13 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.88 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 200 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 3.1 A has a global score of 64.8, which is way better than ZTE Quartz's global score of 51.3. The Nokia 3.1 A is a just a little thicker but noticeably lighter phone than the ZTE Quartz. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Nokia 3.1 A has 9.0 Pie version while ZTE Quartz has Android 4.3.
The ZTE Quartz features a bit better looking screen than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a way lower resolution of 960 x 540 and a lot lesser pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a display with the same size. Nokia 3.1 A has just a bit better hardware performance than ZTE Quartz, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and more processing cores.
Nokia 3.1 A features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than ZTE Quartz, because it has an external memory slot that admits up to 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage capacity. The Nokia 3.1 A has a much better camera than ZTE Quartz, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the Nokia 3.1 A also has a much better 1920x1080 video definition.
ZTE Quartz has just a bit longer battery performance than Nokia 3.1 A, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
Nokia 3.1 A costs the same than ZTE Quartz.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.