Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.90 x 2.56 x 0.45 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.20 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gray | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1400 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 2,03 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.22 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1735mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 312 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is much better than ZTE Radiant's 49.5 overall score. The Galaxy S9 is a just a bit heavier but incredibly thinner device than the ZTE Radiant. Galaxy S9 has a better performance than ZTE Radiant, because it has 6 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy S9 counts with a more vivid display than ZTE Radiant, because it has a way greater pixels density, a way larger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much better storage to install games and applications than ZTE Radiant, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 400 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a way better battery life than ZTE Radiant, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity. Galaxy S9 counts with a way better camera than ZTE Radiant, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way better (4K) video quality.
Galaxy S9 costs a little more than ZTE Radiant, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.