Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.6 | 31.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Sony |
| Android 4.1, 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2007-02-06 |
| 5.00 x 2.55 x 0.39 inches | 4.05 x 1.81 x 0.65 inches |
| 4.58 ounces | 2.89 ounces |
| $ 45.00 | $ 45.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | -- |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| LCD | STN |
| 256 pixels per inch | 57 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 4.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset | -- |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 768 MB (333 MHz) RAM | -- |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | GPU |
| 7.92 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 2,05 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 0.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 0.30 MP |
| 6.05 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| CDMA | GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.5 | 0.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 900mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 220 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 300 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 3.52 | 2.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | -- |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | -- |
Comparison review
ZTE Warp Sequent has a score of 46.6, which is much better than the Sony Ericsson K200's 31.7 general score. ZTE Warp Sequent is a noticeably heavier but thinner phone than Sony Ericsson K200. ZTE Warp Sequent features a much better performing processing unit than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has a greater number of cores and an extra graphics processor.
The ZTE Warp Sequent features a much more vibrant screen than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has a much better resolution of 960 x 540px and a lot better display pixels density. ZTE Warp Sequent features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 32 GB.
ZTE Warp Sequent features a very superior battery life than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has an 83 percent bigger battery size. The ZTE Warp Sequent takes a lot better photos and videos than Sony Ericsson K200, because it has a way better 5 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The ZTE Warp Sequent costs the same than the Sony Ericsson K200.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.