Compare phones
ZTE Warp Sync
N9515Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G
SGH-T769| Global Score | |
| 54.8 | 58.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.0.4, 2.3.6 |
| -- | 2012-01-10 |
| 5.60 x 2.90 x 0.40 inches | 4.79 x 2.48 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 4.50 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 95.00 | $ 85.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 480 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 233 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 1 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 2.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 3.2 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 1750mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 12 hours talk time | 230 hours standby time 7 hours talk time |
| 4.24 | 3.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S Blaze 4G is a bit better than ZTE Warp Sync, with a 58.7 score against 54.8. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S Blaze 4G has the previous 4.0.4 version while ZTE Warp Sync has Android 4.4.2. The Galaxy S Blaze 4G body is a little thicker but noticeably lighter than the ZTE Warp Sync.
ZTE Warp Sync counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S Blaze 4G, because it has a better graphics co-processor working at 450 megahertz, a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (although they are slower). ZTE Warp Sync has a brighter screen than Galaxy S Blaze 4G, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a much better resolution of 1280 x 720 and a bigger display.
The ZTE Warp Sync counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S Blaze 4G, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1280x720 (HD) video quality, the ZTE Warp Sync also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels. The ZTE Warp Sync features much more storage for applications and games than Galaxy S Blaze 4G, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 64 GB and 8 GB internal memory.
The ZTE Warp Sync has superior battery duration than Galaxy S Blaze 4G, because it has a 2300mAh battery capacity instead of 1750mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S Blaze 4G is also cheaper than the ZTE Warp Sync.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.