Compare phones
ZTE WeGo
S155KT| Global Score | |
| 24.6 | 27.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Cricket |
| -- | 2009-09-22 |
| 3.55 x 2.04 x 0.67 inches | 3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches |
| 2.90 ounces | 2.82 ounces |
| White | -- |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.8 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 160 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 52 pixels per inch | 114 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.2 | 5.4 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| Camera | |
| -- | 0.30 MP |
| 0 | 3.63 |
| -- | CDMA |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Battery | 920mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 250 hours standby time 5 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.48 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
Comparison review
Cricket CAPTR has a score of 27.9, which is much better than ZTE WeGo's 24.6 overall score. The Cricket CAPTR body is just a little lighter but a little thicker than the ZTE WeGo. Cricket CAPTR counts with a CPU that's just as good as the ZTE WeGo one, both have the same number of cores. The Cricket CAPTR has a much better screen than ZTE WeGo, because it has a much better pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a slightly better resolution of 160 x 128px.
Cricket CAPTR counts with as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as the ZTE WeGo one. Cricket CAPTR has a lot better camera than ZTE WeGo. Cricket CAPTR counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than ZTE WeGo, because it has a 920mAh battery capacity.
Cricket CAPTR costs exactly the same than ZTE WeGo, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.