Compare phones
Samsung Captivate Glide
SGH-I927| Global Score | |
| 55.7 | 61 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow, 5.1 Lollipop | Android 4.0, 2.3 |
| 2015-09-25 | 2011-10-11 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 4.90 x 2.50 x 0.50 inches |
| 5.99 ounces | 5.20 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 180.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 480 x 800 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 233 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.1 | 7.65 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 7.15 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 5.5 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 396 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 3.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Captivate Glide has a general score of 61, which is slightly better than ZTE ZMAX 2's 55.7 global score. Even though the Samsung Captivate Glide is much older and notably thicker than ZTE ZMAX 2, it's construction is still somewhat lighter. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Samsung Captivate Glide has older 4.0 version while ZTE ZMAX 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Captivate Glide has a little bit better screen than ZTE ZMAX 2, although it has a really smaller screen, a little less pixels per inch in the screen and a way worse 800 x 480 resolution. The ZTE ZMAX 2 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Captivate Glide, because it has 16 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 64 GB.
ZTE ZMAX 2 counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Captivate Glide, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The Samsung Captivate Glide captures much clearer videos and photos than ZTE ZMAX 2. Both have the same video frame rate, a same resolution back-facing camera and the same (HD) video quality.
ZTE ZMAX 2 counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Captivate Glide, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1650mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Captivate Glide is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.