Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.5 | 58.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HTC |
| Windows 8 | Android 3.2, 2.3.3 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2011-02-15 |
| 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches | 7.69 x 4.80 x 0.52 inches |
| 23.81 ounces | 14.82 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11.6 inches | 7 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1024 x 600 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | TFT |
| 135 pixels per inch | 170 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1 GB (333 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU | Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 1470 hours standby time |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC Flyer has a global score of 58.7, which is a bit better than the Asus VivoTab's 57.5 global score. HTC Flyer works with Android 3.2 OS, while Asus VivoTab counts with Windows 8 OS. The HTC Flyer body is much lighter than Asus VivoTab, but it's a lot thicker and was released around 16 months before.
HTC Flyer counts with a little sharper screen than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a way smaller display and a way worse 600 x 1024 resolution, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity in each inch of display. Asus VivoTab has a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC Flyer, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage.
Asus VivoTab features a bit faster processing unit than HTC Flyer, because it has a greater number of cores, a much better graphics co-processor running at 533 MHz and more RAM. HTC Flyer counts with a much better battery performance than Asus VivoTab. HTC Flyer counts with a bit better camera than Asus VivoTab, although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower 5 megapixels resolution and a much worse 1280x720 video definition.
Even being the best tablet in this comparison, the HTC Flyer is also cheap compared to the other tablet, which makes this tablet a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.