| Global Score | |
| 57.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Windows 8 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2013-09-04 |
| 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 23.81 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11.6 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 135 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot better than Asus VivoTab, having a score of 75.8 against 57.5. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014)'s body is newer, a bit thinner and lighter than Asus VivoTab. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) works with Android 4.4.2 operating system, while Asus VivoTab works with Windows 8 operating system.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a bit superior processing unit than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a slower graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features an incredibly better looking display than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1600 x 2560 pixels and way more pixels per inch of screen.
The Asus VivoTab counts with a slightly better memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a way better battery life than Asus VivoTab. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014)'s camera is very similar to Asus VivoTab's camera, both of them have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the same resolution camera in the back and the same video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot more expensive than the Asus VivoTab, but you can get a much better tablet for that extra dollars.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.