Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Windows 8 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 10.43 x 6.73 x 0.38 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 20.46 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 155 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot better than the Asus VivoTab Smart, having a general score of 75.8 against 58.7. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a thinner and a little bit lighter tablet device than Asus VivoTab Smart. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with Android 4.4.2 OS, and Asus VivoTab Smart counts with Windows 8 OS.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with an incredibly better looking display than Asus VivoTab Smart, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a way higher pixel amount per inch in the display and a way better 1600 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Asus VivoTab Smart counts with a little bit more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Asus VivoTab Smart, because although it has a worse 450 MHz GPU, it also counts with 1 GB more RAM and 2 more cpu cores. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a superior battery life than Asus VivoTab Smart. The Asus VivoTab Smart counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014). Both of them have the same video frame rate, a camera with an 8 MP and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) costs a lot more money than the Asus VivoTab Smart, but you can get a much better tablet for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.