Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
16GB LTEN5120
| Global Score | |
| 58.7 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Windows 8 | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 |
| -- | 2013-02-24 |
| 10.43 x 6.73 x 0.38 inches | 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches |
| 20.46 ounces | 11.92 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 300.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 155 pixels per inch | 189 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset |
| Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is much better than the Asus VivoTab Smart, with a score of 69.2 against 58.7. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0's body is incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than Asus VivoTab Smart. The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 works with Android 4.4.2 operating system, while Asus VivoTab Smart comes with Windows 8 operating system.
The Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with a little bit better looking display than Asus VivoTab Smart, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little bit lower resolution of 800 x 1280px, it also counts with a little better display density. The Asus VivoTab Smart has a superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Asus VivoTab Smart, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 8.0 also has more CPU cores (although they are slower) and a much better graphics co-processor working at 1.06 GHz. Asus VivoTab Smart shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a much higher (Full HD) video definition and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Note 8.0 has a superior battery performance than Asus VivoTab Smart.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 not only is the best tablets in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Asus VivoTab Smart, making this tablet a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.