Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 57.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| Android 2.3.3 | Windows 8 |
| 2011-09-29 | 2012-06-04 |
| 7.69 x 4.80 x 0.52 inches | 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches |
| 14.82 ounces | 23.81 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 280.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| TFT | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 170 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | -- |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | -- |
| 2.6 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1470 hours standby time | -- |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus VivoTab is slightly better than HTC Flyer CDMA, having a 57.5 score against 57.3. The Asus VivoTab comes with Windows 8 operating system, and HTC Flyer CDMA has Android 2.3.3 operating system. Even though Asus VivoTab and the HTC Flyer CDMA were only released with a couple months difference, Asus VivoTab's construction is noticeably thinner but also incredibly heavier than the HTC Flyer CDMA.
The HTC Flyer CDMA has a slightly better looking display than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a lot lower 600 x 1024px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density. Asus VivoTab has slightly more memory for apps and games than HTC Flyer CDMA, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Asus VivoTab counts with a better performing processing unit than HTC Flyer CDMA, because it has an additional graphics processor, 1 more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM. HTC Flyer CDMA has a much longer battery lifetime than Asus VivoTab. The HTC Flyer CDMA captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Asus VivoTab, although it has a lot worse 1280x720 video resolution and a back camera with a lot lower 5 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.