Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 56.6 | 57.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Asus |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Windows 8 |
| 2011-02-15 | 2012-06-04 |
| 7.70 x 4.80 x 0.52 inches | 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches |
| 14.80 ounces | 23.81 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 280.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| -- | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 170 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 6.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | -- |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (333 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1470 hours standby time | -- |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus VivoTab has a global score of 57.5, which is a little bit better than the HTC Flyer Wi-Fi's score of 56.6. The Asus VivoTab comes with Windows 8 OS, while HTC Flyer Wi-Fi comes with Android 3.2 OS. The Asus VivoTab is a newer and notably thinner tablet than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, but it is also heavier.
The HTC Flyer Wi-Fi features a slightly better looking display than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 600 x 1024px, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of display. The Asus VivoTab counts with a bit more powerful processor than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because it has a much better graphics processing unit running at 533 megahertz, a greater number of cores and more RAM memory.
Asus VivoTab counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage capacity. The HTC Flyer Wi-Fi has a much longer battery lifetime than Asus VivoTab.
HTC Flyer Wi-Fi takes just a bit better photos and videos than Asus VivoTab, although it has a back facing camera with much less megapixels resolution and a way lower 1280x720 (HD) video quality.
Asus VivoTab costs a bit more than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, but you can get a better tablet for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.