| Global Score | |
| 58.6 | 61 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Asus |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.2 | Windows RT |
| -- | 2012-06-04 |
| 8.30 x 4.89 x 0.39 inches | 10.33 x 6.73 x 0.33 inches |
| 12.06 ounces | 18.87 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Orange and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 105.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 800 x 1280 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 189 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8926 chipset | NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (750 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | ULP GeForce @ 520 MHz GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 3 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.08 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
The Asus VivoTab RT has an overall score of 61, which is slightly better than the LG G Pad 8.0's 58.6 overall score. The Asus VivoTab RT works with Windows RT OS, while LG G Pad 8.0 counts with Android 5.0 OS. Asus VivoTab RT's design is heavier but somewhat thinner than the LG G Pad 8.0. LG G Pad 8.0 counts with a brighter display than Asus VivoTab RT, because although it has a bit worse 1280 x 800px resolution and a really smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixel density.
The LG G Pad 8.0 has a little bit better hardware performance than Asus VivoTab RT, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the LG G Pad 8.0 also counts with an additional GPU. Asus VivoTab RT has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than LG G Pad 8.0, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory capacity.
Asus VivoTab RT has a way better camera than LG G Pad 8.0, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Asus VivoTab RT also has a back-facing camera with much more MP. LG G Pad 8.0 features a much better battery lifetime than Asus VivoTab RT.
Although Asus VivoTab RT is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG G Pad 8.0, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG G Pad 8.0. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the LG G Pad 8.0, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.