| Global Score | |
| 62.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 7.1 Nougat | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2017-10-31 | 2013-09-04 |
| 8.50 x 5.00 x 0.31 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.35 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| $ 150.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| -- | Super Clear LCD |
| 189 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6750 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.36 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 5.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is much better than LG G Pad F2 8.0, getting a score of 75.8 against 62.7. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has older 4.4.2 version while LG G Pad F2 8.0 has Android 7.1 Nougat version. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a noticeably heavier portable tablet than the LG G Pad F2 8.0, but they are equally thin.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a bit superior processor than LG G Pad F2 8.0, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a graphics processing unit and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a way better looking display than LG G Pad F2 8.0, because it has a larger screen, a way better 1600 x 2560 pixels resolution and a lot greater screen density.
LG G Pad F2 8.0 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has just 16 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a little bit better camera than LG G Pad F2 8.0, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a superior battery performance than LG G Pad F2 8.0, because it has a 174 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G Pad F2 8.0, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G Pad F2 8.0. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the LG G Pad F2 8.0, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.