Compare tablets
Asus VivoTab
810| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 57.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Windows 8 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2012-06-04 |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 23.81 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 610.00 | $ 280.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 6.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | -- |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot better than Asus VivoTab, with a general score of 75.8 against 57.5. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) body is newer, lighter and a little thinner than the Asus VivoTab. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) comes with Android 4.4.2 OS, while Asus VivoTab counts with Windows 8 OS.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a way better looking display than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better pixel density and a lot better resolution of 1600 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with just a bit better performance than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a weaker graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
Asus VivoTab features a camera that is very similar to the camera in Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), both of them have the same video frame rate, the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same resolution back camera. Asus VivoTab features a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a superior battery duration than Asus VivoTab.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot more expensive than the Asus VivoTab, but you can get a much better tablet for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.