Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 58.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Windows 8 |
| 2013-09-04 | -- |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 10.43 x 6.73 x 0.38 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 20.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 610.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | IPS LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | -- |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 7.1 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is way better than Asus VivoTab Smart, with a global score of 75.8 against 58.7. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has Android 4.4.2 operating system, while Asus VivoTab Smart counts with Windows 8 operating system. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a thinner and a little bit lighter tablet than Asus VivoTab Smart.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features just a bit better processing power than Asus VivoTab Smart, because although it has a worse graphics processing unit running at 450 megahertz, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features an incredibly better display than Asus VivoTab Smart, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a lot better pixels number per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1600 x 2560 pixels.
The Asus VivoTab Smart has a bit bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a superior battery duration than Asus VivoTab Smart. The Asus VivoTab Smart captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014). Both of them have a back facing camera with an 8 mega-pixels resolution, the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot more expensive than the Asus VivoTab Smart, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better tablet for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.