| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 63.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 3.1 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2011-08-31 |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 9.87 x 7.00 x 0.51 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 25.00 ounces |
| Black and White | Black |
| $ 610.00 | $ 239.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1280 x 768 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | LCD |
| 299 pixels per inch | 148 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 7.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 7.1 | 5.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 7300mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | 900 hours standby time |
| 9.12 | 8.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is much better than the HTC Jetstream, with a 75.8 score against 63.6. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a noticeably newer portable tablet, and it's also noticeably lighter and way thinner than the HTC Jetstream. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a more recent 4.4.2 version while HTC Jetstream has Android 3.1.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a faster processor than HTC Jetstream, because it has a much better 450 MHz graphics processor, a higher number of cores and 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a lot better screen than HTC Jetstream, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has much more pixels per inch in the screen and a lot better 1600 x 2560 resolution.
HTC Jetstream shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014). Both have a back camera with an 8 mega pixels resolution, the same video quality and the same video frame rate. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features just a bit more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Jetstream, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than HTC Jetstream, because it has 8220mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) costs a lot more than HTC Jetstream, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.