| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3 | Android 3.2 |
| 2013-09-04 | 2011-11-03 |
| 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches | 8.50 x 5.47 x 0.35 inches |
| 19.29 ounces | 13.62 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 610.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1600 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| Super Clear LCD | TFT |
| 299 pixels per inch | 184 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | TI OMAP 4430 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Micro SIM | SIM |
| 7.1 | 3.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 43 hours talk time | -- |
| 9.12 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a global score of 75.8, which is way better than Motorola Xoom 2 Media Edition's score of 60.4. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) body is newer and thinner than Motorola Xoom 2 Media Edition's, but it's incredibly heavier. Both tablets in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has newer 4.4.2 version while Motorola Xoom 2 Media Edition has Android 3.2 version, so it offers a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a more powerful processing unit than Motorola Xoom 2 Media Edition, because it has a much better graphics co-processor working at 450 megahertz, more cpu cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a much better looking screen than Motorola Xoom 2 Media Edition, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1600 x 2560px, a way higher count of pixels per inch of screen and a bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Xoom 2 Media Edition, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 64 GB. Motorola Xoom 2 Media Edition captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a lot lower (HD) video resolution.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a way better battery performance than Motorola Xoom 2 Media Edition, because it has a 111% greater battery size.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.