| Global Score | |
| 69.2 | 57.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 | Windows 8 |
| 2013-02-24 | 2012-06-04 |
| 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches | 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches |
| 11.92 ounces | 23.81 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 280.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| TFT | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 189 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 6.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
The Galaxy Note 8.0 is way better than the Asus VivoTab, getting a 69.2 score against 57.5. Although the Galaxy Note 8.0 and Asus VivoTab were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy Note 8.0 is notably lighter and just a little bit thinner. The Galaxy Note 8.0 works with Android 4.4.2 operating system, while Asus VivoTab counts with Windows 8 operating system.
Galaxy Note 8.0 features a little sharper screen than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 800 x 1280px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Asus VivoTab, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 also has a much better 1064 MHz graphics processor and a higher number of cores (although slower).
Asus VivoTab counts with a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 8.0, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 features just a bit better camera than Asus VivoTab, although it has a camera with a lot lower 5 mega-pixels resolution and a lot lower 1280x720 video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with a much longer battery duration than Asus VivoTab.
Galaxy Note 8.0 costs a bit more money than the Asus VivoTab, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.