Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
16GB LTEN5120
Asus VivoTab RT
64 GB LTE| Global Score | |
| 69.2 | 61 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 | Windows RT |
| 2013-02-24 | 2012-06-04 |
| 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches | 10.33 x 6.73 x 0.33 inches |
| 11.92 ounces | 18.87 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| TFT | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 189 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset | NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB (750 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | ULP GeForce @ 520 MHz GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has a global score of 69.2, which is much better than the Asus VivoTab RT's 61 score. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 works with Android 4.4.2 OS, while Asus VivoTab RT works with Windows RT OS. Although the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 and the Asus VivoTab RT were released only a couple of months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is extremely lighter and just a little thinner.
Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with a faster CPU than Asus VivoTab RT, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 8.0 also has an extra graphics co-processor. The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has a slightly better looking display than Asus VivoTab RT, because although it has a much smaller display and a bit lower 800 x 1280px resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Asus VivoTab RT counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note 8.0, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 48 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 8.0 has a much longer battery life than Asus VivoTab RT. Asus VivoTab RT takes just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a way better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition.
The Galaxy Note 8.0 costs a bit more than the Asus VivoTab RT, but you can get a better tablet for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.