Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
16GB LTEN5120
| Global Score | |
| 69.2 | 58.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 | Windows 8 |
| 2013-02-24 | -- |
| 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches | 10.43 x 6.73 x 0.38 inches |
| 11.92 ounces | 20.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 285.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 189 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.48 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 8.0 is much better than the Asus VivoTab Smart, with a global score of 69.2 against 58.7. The Galaxy Note 8.0 design is way lighter and somewhat thinner than Asus VivoTab Smart. Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with Android 4.4.2 OS, and Asus VivoTab Smart comes with Windows 8 OS. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has a bit more vivid display than Asus VivoTab Smart, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 800 x 1280 and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels number per inch of screen.
Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with a little bit better processing power than Asus VivoTab Smart, and although they both have a 2 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 8.0 also has a better 1.06 GHz graphics co-processor and a larger number of cores. The Asus VivoTab Smart has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a way higher video quality.
Asus VivoTab Smart has a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 8.0, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Note 8.0 features a superior battery performance than Asus VivoTab Smart.
The Galaxy Note 8.0 is not only the best tablets of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one, making buying this tablet a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.