Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 57.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 2.2 | Windows 8 |
| 2010-09-02 | 2012-06-04 |
| 7.48 x 4.74 x 0.47 inches | 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches |
| 13.40 ounces | 23.81 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 529.00 | $ 280.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| TFT | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 170 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.6 | 6.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 3 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A8 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (200 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 7.47 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 1.9 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.16 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | -- |
| 2.6 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus VivoTab has a general score of 57.5, which is slightly better than Galaxy Tab CDMA's 53.9 score. Asus VivoTab's construction is newer and notably thinner, but also extremely heavier than the Galaxy Tab CDMA. Asus VivoTab works with Windows 8 OS, while Galaxy Tab CDMA counts with Android 2.2 OS.
The Asus VivoTab has a superior performance than Galaxy Tab CDMA, because it has a faster graphics processor running at 533 MHz, more cpu cores and 1,5 GB more RAM. Galaxy Tab CDMA has a little sharper screen than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a lot worse 600 x 1024 resolution and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density.
The Asus VivoTab counts with a much greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy Tab CDMA, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Galaxy Tab CDMA features a way better battery lifetime than Asus VivoTab. Asus VivoTab features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Tab CDMA, because it has a much higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and a back facing camera with a much higher resolution.
Despite of being the best tablet in this comparison, Asus VivoTab is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.