Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Alcatel | Motorola |
| Windows 10 Mobile | -- |
| 2016-11-10 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.05 x 2.97 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has a general score of 78.5, which is slightly better than the Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows's score of 72.1. The Motorola One Action body is much newer than the Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows's, but it's somewhat heavier and a lot thicker. The Motorola One Action features a little better hardware performance than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola One Action also has more cpu cores.
Motorola One Action has just a bit better screen than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a bit higher screen density. The Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows has just a bit better camera than Motorola One Action, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Motorola One Action counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Motorola One Action features a bit superior battery life than Alcatel Idol 4S with Windows, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.