Search


Compare phones

Global Score
3127.9
Basic Information
AlcatelCricket
--2009-09-22
3.78 x 1.84 x 0.66 inches3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches
2.46 ounces2.82 ounces
Black, Gray and Red--
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches1.8 inches
128 x 160 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
114 pixels per inch114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.35.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
2,05 MB internal memory--
microSD (up to 2 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.540
Camera
0.30 MP0.30 MP
3.633.63
GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
650mAh Li-Ion Battery920mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
500 hours standby time
7 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
22.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0Bluetooth

Comparison review

The Alcatel OT-565 is much better than Cricket CAPTR, having a 31 score against 27.9. The Alcatel OT-565 construction is thinner and lighter than the Cricket CAPTR. The Cricket CAPTR's processing unit is just as good as the processor in Alcatel OT-565, both have the same number of cores. The Cricket CAPTR counts with a bit better looking screen than Alcatel OT-565. Both of them have the same exact resolution of 160 x 128px, the same display density and a same size screen.

Cricket CAPTR features a camera that is very similar to the Alcatel OT-565 one, they have a back-facing camera with a 0.3 megapixels. The Alcatel OT-565 has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 2 GB.

The Cricket CAPTR counts with a very superior battery performance than Alcatel OT-565, because it has a 42 percent more battery capacity.

Alcatel OT-565 costs exactly the same than Cricket CAPTR.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.