Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Amazon | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-18 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.50 x 2.60 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Purple, Red and Yellow | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 285 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is better than Amazon Fire Phone, having a global score of 81.6 against 69.6. The Google Pixel 2 body is way newer, somewhat thinner and lighter than the Amazon Fire Phone. Google Pixel 2 has a little faster processor than Amazon Fire Phone, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Amazon Fire Phone features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 2, although it has a quite smaller display, a way worse pixels density and a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720px. Google Pixel 2 has a slightly better camera than Amazon Fire Phone, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments and a much higher (4K) video quality.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Amazon Fire Phone, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 2 has a bit better battery lifetime than Amazon Fire Phone, because it has 2700mAh of battery capacity against 2400mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Google Pixel 2 is also cheaper, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.