Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 12 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is better than Google Pixel 6a, with a overall score of 85.3 against 76.4. The iPhone 11 Pro Max is an extremely older and way heavier device than Google Pixel 6a, but Apple was able to build it just a bit thinner anyway. IPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, and Google Pixel 6a comes with Android 12 operating system.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a much better looking screen than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a quite larger display, a quite better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels and a just a little better display density. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a much better hardware performance than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 6 CPU cores, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 6a, although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution back camera, a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and videos in poorly lited environments and a lower (4K) video resolution. The Google Pixel 6a features a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Google Pixel 6a has a little better battery life than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 6a, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Google Pixel 6a. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the iPhone 11 Pro Max, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 6a, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.