Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | LG |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 Pro Max is a little bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a general score of 85.3 against 81.3. The iPhone 11 Pro Max is a newer phone than the LG V35 ThinQ, but it is way heavier and just a little bit thicker. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit more powerful processor than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has 2 lesser and slower cores and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max has a slightly better display than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a just a bit lower pixels density and a bit worse resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels, it also counts with a little larger display. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has just a bit better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing pictures or videos in low light environments, a lower video resolution and a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a much bigger storage for applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have the same internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. IPhone 11 Pro Max counts with longer battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3969mAh battery size.
Although iPhone 11 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V35 ThinQ. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy LG V35 ThinQ, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.