Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting a general score of 85.3 against 79.9. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max construction is a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it is somewhat heavier and was released 4 years before. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G comes with Android 14 operating system.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has much darker screen, and they both have a display of the same size, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a slightly higher 1242 x 2688 resolution and a little bit better number of pixels in each screen inch.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better camera than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier camera sensor giving a worse image quality and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a camera with a way better 50 MP resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a much bigger memory for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 5G has longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.