Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Sony |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a little bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, with a score of 85.3 against 79. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max construction is newer and a lot thinner than the Xperia XZ2 Compact's, but it's also much heavier. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo OS.
IPhone 11 Pro Max and Xperia XZ2 Compact have really similar displays, because although the Xperia XZ2 Compact has less brightness, a lot smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a little greater pixel number per inch of screen. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features just a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has 2 less and slower CPU cores, and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The Xperia XZ2 Compact shoots just a bit better photos and videos than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a larger sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 19 mega pixels resolution.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a very superior storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 400 GB. The iPhone 11 Pro Max features a way better battery duration than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3969mAh battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.