Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has a general score of 85.3, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's global score of 81.6. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max's body is thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, but it is a little bit heavier and was released a bit more more than a year before. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC works with Android 10 OS.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max features a better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a really brighter display, a quite better 1242 x 2688px resolution and a little bit better display density.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC captures better photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a camera in the back with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a way bigger camera sensor.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features a much better storage to store more games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 256 GB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC features greater battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.