Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-20 | -- |
| 6.22 x 3.06 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.97 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 456 pixels per inch | 481 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 810 MT6833 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3969mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is slightly better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, having an 85.3 score against 82.2. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max is a somewhat heavier but just a bit thinner cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11. Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max comes with iOS 15.x OS, and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 counts with Android 11 OS.
IPhone 11 Pro Max has a faster processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, although it has a bit smaller screen, a bit lower 1242 x 2688 resolution and a little bit worse pixel density.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11, because although it has a camera with way less mega-pixels, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better photo and video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 has greater battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3969mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.