Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is a bit better than the iPhone 11 Pro, getting a global score of 90.5 against 84.9. Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, and iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS. Even being the best cellphone in this comparison, we must highlight that it is also just a little thicker and just a little heavier.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher count of pixels in each inch of display and a little higher 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution. IPhone 11 Pro features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has lesser and slower cores and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a much better camera than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy A90 5G features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior battery duration than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.