Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-20 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.35 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 84.9 score against 77.8. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 OS. Apple iPhone 11 Pro's design is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released 5 years before.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a better display than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with way more screen brightness, a much bigger display and a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer photos and videos than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone 11 Pro is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.