Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, getting a general score of 83.3 against 78.9. The iPhone 11 counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Google Pixel 3a XL counts with Android 11 OS. The iPhone 11 is an a little thicker and heavier cellphone than the Google Pixel 3a XL. Apple iPhone 11 features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a just a little worse display density and a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
IPhone 11 and Google Pixel 3a XL count with really similar memory capacity for games and applications, both of them have equal 64 GB internal memory. The Apple iPhone 11 has a superior processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
Google Pixel 3a XL counts with better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery size. Apple iPhone 11 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Apple iPhone 11, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3a XL, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.