Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2019-09-20 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, having a overall score of 83.3 against 77.4. The Apple iPhone 11 is a way newer cellphone than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it is way thicker and noticeably heavier. IPhone 11 features a more powerful processing unit than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has 2 less processing cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 11 has a slightly better looking display than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit worse amount of pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower 828 x 1792 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen. Moto Z2 Play features a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone 11, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Play also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone 11 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4% bigger battery size. IPhone 11 features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same resolution camera in the back, the iPhone 11 also counts with higher video frame rates.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z2 Play. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone 11, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Moto Z2 Play, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.