Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 699.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 324 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone 11 has a score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy A70's overall score of 76.9. The iPhone 11 has iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 OS. IPhone 11's body is a little thicker and a little heavier than the Galaxy A70. IPhone 11 counts with a greater hardware performance than Galaxy A70, because although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone 11 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a little bit smaller display, a way lower resolution of 828 x 1792 and a bit lower number of pixels per display inch. Apple iPhone 11 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with better video frame rates and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much better memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone 11, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A70 has a way better battery duration than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3110mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 11 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A70, and give up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.