Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-20 | 2019-02-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.84 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Green, Purple, Red, White and Yellow | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1792 x 828 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 324 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3110mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 11 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, having a general score of 83.3 against 78.9. The Apple iPhone 11 construction is just a little thinner but a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy M20, and both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Apple iPhone 11 comes with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with Android 10 operating system.
IPhone 11 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M20, although it has a bit worse pixels density, a little smaller screen and a much lower 828 x 1792 resolution. The Apple iPhone 11 features a better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 11 also counts with a 64-bits processor.
Apple iPhone 11 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video resolution, a larger camera aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a larger back-facing camera sensor. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a lot bigger storage for applications and games than iPhone 11, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M20 has a superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3110mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.