Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 14.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-13 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 699.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 477 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 mini is better than the Motorola Moto Z Force, having an 88.5 score against 75.8. Although the Apple iPhone 12 mini is just a bit thicker than Motorola Moto Z Force, it's somewhat lighter and also incredibly newer. The Apple iPhone 12 mini counts with iOS 14.x operating system, and Motorola Moto Z Force works with Android 7.0 Nougat operating system.
The iPhone 12 mini features a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto Z Force, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a little lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a much better storage for games and applications than iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force also has an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone 12 mini features a more powerful processing unit than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 12 mini also has a 64 bits processing unit and 2 more processing cores. Moto Z Force features a really longer battery life than iPhone 12 mini, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 2227mAh.
The Motorola Moto Z Force's camera is very similar to the iPhone 12 mini one, because although the Motorola Moto Z Force has a tinier camera aperture and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a camera with way more megapixels.
Although iPhone 12 mini is a better device, it costs a lot more than Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z Force. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy iPhone 12 mini, else you can save some money and buy the Moto Z Force, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.