Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-11-13 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is much better than Moto Z Force, having a 93.2 score against 75.8. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x OS, and Moto Z Force works with Android 7.0 Nougat OS. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a a lot newer phone than the Moto Z Force, although it is a little thicker and incredibly heavier.
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a slightly better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1284 x 2778px and a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen. Moto Z Force features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a faster CPU than Moto Z Force, because it has a 64-bits CPU, a larger amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Moto Z Force, because it has 3687mAh of battery capacity. The Moto Z Force has a camera that's just as good as the iPhone 12 Pro Max one, because although the Moto Z Force has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Although Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Moto Z Force, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.