Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 457 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max is better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a general score of 93.2 against 79.8. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x OS, while Motorola One Hyper works with Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max design is newer and thinner, but also heavier than the Motorola One Hyper.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a faster CPU than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and more RAM memory. IPhone 12 Pro Max features a more vivid screen than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a better 1284 x 2778 pixels resolution, a little bit larger screen and a just a little higher count of pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola One Hyper has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper has just a little better battery life than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a much better camera than Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light photos and video and slower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a way more MP back camera.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.