Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x | Android 11 |
| 2020-11-13 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 8.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1100.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.62 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 12 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's score of 85.6. Despite being the best phone in this comparison review, the iPhone 12 Pro Max construction is older, just a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a quite better processing power than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lower number of cores and 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a little bit higher 1284 x 2778px resolution and a just a bit greater display pixels density.
IPhone 12 Pro Max and Galaxy Z Flip 3 have very similar memory for applications, games, photos and videos, both have the same internal storage capacity. IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery capacity. The iPhone 12 Pro Max takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution, the iPhone 12 Pro Max also has a larger aperture to take better low-light images.
The iPhone 12 Pro Max costs a bit more money than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.