Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS | Android |
| -- | 2019-09-04 |
| -- | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 7.27 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 477 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit Single-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| -- | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2406mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a general score of 90.5, which is way better than the iPhone 13 mini's global score of 73. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android operating system, while iPhone 13 mini comes with iOS operating system. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit more powerful processing unit than iPhone 13 mini, because although it has a 32-bits processing unit against 64-bits, it also counts with 7 more cores.
The iPhone 13 mini features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel count in each inch of display. Galaxy A90 5G counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone 13 mini, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 13 mini, because it has an 87 percent larger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a much better camera than iPhone 13 mini, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and videos and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.